The Threat to Judicial Independence

Why should it be any surprise that a judge is worried about the people exercising their rights? Check the calendar for the Sovereign Solutions interview with Bill Stegmeier and Jake Hanes on the South Dakota "JAIL 4 Judges" Amendment E.
Rich
=============

The Wall Street Journal

COMMENTARY

The Threat to Judicial Independence

By SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR

September 27, 2006; Page A18

In November, South Dakotans will vote on a state constitutional amendment being advocated by a national group called "JAIL 4 Judges." If the amendment passes, it would eliminate judicial immunity, and enable a special grand jury to censure judges for their official legal determinations. Although the amendment's supporters claim they seek a "judicial accountability initiative law" (JAIL), they aspire to something far more sinister -- judicial intimidation. Indeed, the national Web site of JAIL 4 Judges boasts with striking candor that the organization "has that intimidation factor flowing through the judicial system."

It is tempting to dismiss this proposed amendment as merely an isolated bout of anti-judge angst. But while the JAIL 4 Judges initiative is unusually venomous, it is far from alone in expressing skepticism of the judiciary. In addition to South Dakota, this election cycle has witnessed efforts in at least three other states that are designed to rein in judges who have supposedly "run amok."

Not to be completely outdone, Congress also has engaged in recent efforts to police the judiciary. Seeking to constrain the legal sources that are available to judges, some members of Congress have advocated measures that would forbid judges from citing foreign law when they are interpreting the Constitution. In addition, bills have been introduced in both houses of Congress supporting the creation of an inspector general to investigate and monitor the federal bench. Finally, the House of Representatives passed legislation over the summer that would prohibit the Supreme Court from considering whether the Pledge of Allegiance's inclusion of the words "under God" violates the First Amendment.

* * *

For complete text, see:
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB115931733674775033-lMyQjAxMDE2NTI5NzMyMTc3Wj.html